Or buy at: Store.
But the organizers want access to taxes and the power of the law to carry out their plans. In addition to oppression and injustice, this desire also includes the disastrous assumption that those organizers are infallible, and that the people are incompetent. But, again, if the people are incapable of judging themselves, what is the point of talking about universal suffrage? Cause of the French revolution The contradiction in thought, regrettable but perfectly plausible, is reflected in events in France. The French, for example, have led all other Europeans to the struggle for their rights - or more precisely, to their political demands. However, this fact has not taken us away from being the most governed, the most regulated, the most imposed, the most bound and the most exploited in Europe. France also leads all other peoples to a place where one always feels revolution is imminent. Under such circumstances, it is natural. Time spent with piano and dogs is never wasted poster. I will not use, as is often the case, the vague, indefinite, approximate, or metaphorical meaning. I use this word in the scientific sense - to represent the opposite of the concept of property (salary, land, money or anything else). When a portion of property is transferred from its owner - without the person's consent or compensation, whether by force or fraud - to the person who does not own it, then I say possessive. was violated, that the robbery was committed. I say that this is an act that the law is supposed to suppress, anywhere and anytime. When the law carries out actions that are thought to be suppressed by itself, I say that plunder is still being done, and I would add that from the point of view of society and prosperity, rights like that are even worse. But in the case of legal plunder, the person who benefits is not responsible for plunder. The law, the law-makers and society are held accountable for this act of legal plunder. The political danger lies here.
Homepage: TEASEARCH.
Comments