Or buy at: Store.
I know how to respond, I know what objections can be made. But this is not the place for such controversy. I would like to simply remark here that the controversy over universal suffrage (as well as most other political issues) that is stirring up, provoking and overthrowing nations, will lose nearly all of its importance if law were always what it should be. In fact, if the law is only to protect everyone, all freedoms and all property; if the law is merely an organized combination of the individual's right to self-defense; If the law is to obstruct, prevent, punish all oppression and robbery - will we, as citizens, debate the size of the right to vote? Under such circumstances, would the magnitude of the right to vote endanger the ultimate good, to social peace? Wouldn't the electoral classes not wait in peace their right to vote? Would those who have the right to vote fiercely defend their privilege? Wolve once upon a time there was a girl who really loved wolves poster. "From this omen to speculate, the dragon gas gathered in the South, if not in time to solve the solution, I am only afraid that in the long run, it will affect the national identity ..." Emperor Dao Quang heard in the National Master's aura hesitantly wanting to say it again, immediately said: "It's not a crime to say it bluntly, say it." The monk kneeling on the ground bowed his head and said: "Guangdong inherently has nine angelic arowanas, because of the bad luck of heaven, the dragon is dead and then resurrected. If there are any people who randomly bring themselves in, or have a magician intentionally find it, it will create a queen to disturb the world. "
Homepage: TEASEARCH.
Comments