Link To buy: Veteran to our men and woman in uniform poster.
Or buy at: Store.
I know how to respond, I know what objections can be made. But this is not the place for such controversy. I would like to simply remark here that the controversy over universal suffrage (as well as most other political issues) that is stirring up, provoking and overthrowing nations, will lose nearly all of its importance if law were always what it should be. In fact, if the law is only to protect everyone, all freedoms and all property; if the law is merely an organized combination of the individual's right to self-defense; If the law is to obstruct, prevent, punish all oppression and robbery - will we, as citizens, debate the size of the right to vote? Under such circumstances, would the magnitude of the right to vote endanger the ultimate good, to social peace? Wouldn't the electoral classes not wait in peace their right to vote? Would those who have the right to vote fiercely defend their privilege? Veteran to our men and woman in uniform poster. Certainly these classical theories [developed by the teachers, writers, legislators, economists and philosophers of our time] assert that all Everything comes to people from outside sources. To give another example, Fenelon [bishop, writer and teacher of the Duke of Burgundy]. He was a contemporary of Louis XIV. This, coupled with the fact that he was taught in the spirit of classical and old theories naturally caused Fenelon to accept the idea that humanity must be passive; that unhappiness and prosperity, corruption and virtue are all the result of external influences, influenced by law and the legislators. Therefore, in his work of Paradise at Salentum (Utopia of Salentum), he writes that man - with all his rights, abilities, aspirations and possessions lies under the absolute leadership of the founder. France. People cannot solve anything by themselves, the authorities decide on their behalf. He described
Homepage: TEASEARCH.
Comments