Or buy at: Store.
With a monopoly in education, the government must respond to the hopes of parents, who for that reason are deprived of their freedom; And if all these hopes were to dissolve into smoke, who to blame? Taking the control of industry is the government taking responsibility for making it prosper, otherwise depriving it of its freedom would be absurd. And if the industry goes down, who is to blame? Interfering in the balance of trade by changing import and export taxes is that governments are committed to making trade prosper, but if they do not prosper but collapse, who is the fault? Protecting maritime industries to give up their freedoms is the government committed to making these industries profitable, but if they become burdensome for taxpayers, why is it to blame? You don't stop being a farmer when you get old poster. Turning any book on philosophy, politics or history, you will find in our country this idea - son of classical theories, mother of socialism - is deeply rooted. what level. In all of those books you can find the idea that humanity is just inert matter; it has a life, an organization, a morality and prosperity is due to the power of the state. Worse still is the statement that humanity tends to degenerate and it is through the miraculous hand of the legislator that that decline is averted. The ubiquitous classical thought says that behind that passive society is a power, called a law or a lawmaker (or another term, just a person or people of influence and authority. undisputed credit) is driving, controlling, helping and transforming humanity.
Homepage: TEASEARCH.
Comments