Or buy at: Store.
But building the law on the principle of brotherhood - claiming that all good deeds and all bad deeds come from the law; that the law is responsible for all individual misfortune and all social inequality - it opens the door to never-ending complaints, grievances, chaos and revolutions. Justice means equal rights Law is justice. And it would be ridiculous if the law was anything else! Is not justice a right? Are not the rights the same? On what right does the law force me to comply with the social plans of Mr. Mimerel, Mr. de Melun, Mr. Thiers, or Mr. Louis Blanc? If the law had a moral right to do that, why wouldn't it force those gentlemen to submit to my plan? Is it plausible to assume that nature has not given me enough imagination for me to also devise utopia? Should the law choose from among the many monstrous ideas and force the organized forces of government to serve it alone? Skydivers aventures is everywhere you just have to dive to it poster. But if nature is sure to regain its empire, why doesn't Rousseau admit that nature does not need lawmakers to win it in the first place? Why did not you see that, by his instinct, people would cultivate fertile lands and trade on wide and accessible coasts, without the intervention of Lycurgus or Solon or Rousseau, who can easily be confused. The socialists wanted compulsory compliance Regardless, Rousseau gives the creators, the founders, the directors, the legislators, and the social controllers an extremely heavy responsibility. Therefore, he was extremely strict towards them:
Homepage: TEASEARCH.
Comments